Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 270
Queen v. Randall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00672
Plaintiff: Jared M Queen
Defendant: John Randall and Faulkner County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Futch v. Nash
as 1:2016cv00935
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Cheron Y. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Futch v. Nash
as 1:2016cv00934
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Cheron Y. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prowse v. Randall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00511
Plaintiff: Stansel Alexander Prowse
Defendant: John Randall, Scott Huffman, R Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stricklin v. Huffman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00505
Plaintiff: Joshua A Stricklin
Defendant: Scott Huffman and John Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimmel v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00483
Plaintiff: Patrick Kimmel
Defendant: USA, Faulkner County, Arkansas, Andy Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Huffman et al
as 4:2016cv00369
Plaintiff: Walter B Fields, Jr
Defendant: Scott Huffman, Terry Ropper, John Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prowse v. Faulkner County Detention Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00284
Plaintiff: Stansel Alexander Prowse
Defendant: Faulkner County Detention Center, John Randall and Scott Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Futch v. USA
as 16-12131
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. Huffman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00216
Plaintiff: Gaylon Wayne Jackson, Jr
Defendant: Scott Huffman and John Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?