Cases 71 - 80 of 209
Moreno v. Macomber
as 5:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Jose Moreno
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Guillermo Viera Rosa, Cory Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Jacques v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Michael E Jacques and Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jeff Macamber, Jeffery Lynch, Kelly Franceshi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Macomber
as 1:2023at00121
Petitioner:
Shawn Lamont Brown
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grady Harris v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 22-16785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRADY HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, Warden, K. ROSE, Correctional Sergeant, J. MUNOZ, Correctional Officer and others
Keenan Wilkins v. Jeff Macomber
as 22-16072
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden
(PC) Hernandez v. Macomber et al
as 2:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Hernandez
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, L. Holloway, J - Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Keller v. Alison et al
as 1:2021cv01707
Plaintiff:
Paul Stephen Keller
Defendant:
Kathleen Alison, Jeff Macomber, Scott Degough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ismael Villarreal v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-56194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL VILLARREAL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KENNETH J. POGUE, CDCR Director and others
(PC) Hill v. Bowers et al
as 2:2021cv01602
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Bowers, Kathleen Allison, John Novey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darren Cleveland v. Jeff Macomber
as 21-15353
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARREN CLEVELAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
