Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Dunn v. Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00560
Plaintiff:
Maria L. Ambriz, Robin Armstrong, Doris Artica and others
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Dipak Desai, M.D., Dipak Desai, M.D., P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Blackburn v. Pike County, Kentucky et al
as 7:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gregory Blackburn
Defendant:
Pike County, Kentucky , Rodney Scott , Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENKERT et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06314
Plaintiff:
RENE BENKERT , KENNETH BOCHNIAK , WAYNE CATTES and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reynolds v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2010cv02137
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Keebler Commission Network et al
as 1:2010cv02138
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
Keebler Commission Network and Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2010cv02141
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
Fulton County, Fulton County Jail Employees and Ted Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Jackson et al
as 1:2010cv02140
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
Ted Jackson and Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2010cv02139
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
Fulton County, Fulton County Jail and Ted Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Fulton County Public Defender Office et al
as 1:2010cv02115
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
Fulton County Public Defender Office and Angela Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. The State D. A. Office et al
as 1:2010cv02114
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
The State D. A. Office and Andrew Shartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
