Cases 71 - 80 of 288
Lafferty et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2020cv01723
Defendant:
Alex Emric Jones, Midas Resources, Inc., Prison Planet TV, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jillian Soto, Erica Lafferty, Mark Barden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherlach et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2020cv01725
Defendant:
Infowars, LLC, Genesis Communications Network, Inc., Alex Emric Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Parker and William Sherlach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liebert et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2020cv00970
Defendant:
Doug Colvard, Jesse H. Jones and Sean Valle
Plaintiff:
Tim Sestrich and Brian Liebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00963
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Jones
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Miller v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00872
Defendant:
Bowles, Jones, Saunders and others
Plaintiff:
Davon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00871
Respondent:
Chief Judge, Richard Lee Edwards, Diane Easter and others
Petitioner:
Danielle Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00962
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Elmer A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Connecticut Citizens Defense League, Inc. et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
John Lowman, Todd Skilton, Tanysha Brown and others
Defendant:
James Kenny, James Rovella, Brian Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. University of Connecticut Health Center et al
as 3:2020cv00603
Defendant:
Butkevicius, DOC Medical, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schlosser v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Department of Correction, Chelsea and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
