Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Choice Hotels International Inc v. Kelley Properties LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01961
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International Inc
Defendant:
Kelley Properties LLC, Kristy T Baucom, Robert D Kelley, III and others
Counter_claimant:
Zeal LLC , Harshil J Shah , Rajan Gupta and others
Counter_defendant:
Choice Hotels International Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Choice Hotels International Inc v. Carolina Hotel Development LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01964
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International Inc
Defendant:
Carolina Hotel Development LLC, Robert Kelley and Kristy Baucom
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
United States of America v. Kelley
as 4:2013cv01721
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Melanie Kelley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America v. Kelley
as 4:2013mc00126
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Melanie Kelley
Kelley v. USA
as 3:2013cv00739
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Reggie Lamar Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kelley v. USA
as 3:2013cv00206
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Reggie Lamar Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kelley v. Hartsville, City of
as 4:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Melanie Kelley
Defendant:
Hartsville, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kelley v. Bollinger
as 8:2012cv03008
Petitioner:
Emmet Tyrone Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Bollinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley v. South Carolina, State of
as 8:2012mc00346
Plaintiff:
Emmet Kelley
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of
Dunbar v. McCall et al
as 1:2012cv02683
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dunbar
Defendant:
Micheal McCall, Jr, Lt Bennett, Lt Rodriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
