Cases 71 - 80 of 193
Jenkins v. Alabama Pardons and Parole Board et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
Larrie Jenkins
Defendant:
Alabama Pardons and Parole Board, Phil Bryant and Donna Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Alabama Pardons and Parole Board et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00570
Plaintiff:
Larrie Jenkins
Defendant:
Alabama Pardons and Parole Board, Phil Bryant and Donna Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Dunn et al
as 5:2016cv01140
Petitioner:
Huey Lovell Kennedy
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duncan v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2016cv01017
Plaintiff:
Marty Joseph Duncan
Defendant:
Barbara Kennedy, Tracy Pride, Bradley Siner and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnifield v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Minnifield
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Jefferson County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burdick v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2016cv00313
Plaintiff:
Austin Burdick
Defendant:
Anthony M Kennedy , Stephen G Breyer , Ruth Bader Ginsburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Williams et al v. OC Services Corp
as 2:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Williams and Marcus Williams
Defendant:
OC Services Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Longmire v. City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
Carla Longmire
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama , Sandy S. Stimpson , James Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
