Cases 71 - 80 of 548
Hagen v. Girdner et al
as 6:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles David Hagen
Defendant:
TJ Girdner, Johnny Dallis, Mary Burlison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin et al v. CSAA General Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Kevin Baldwin and Christine Baldwin
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance Company an Indiana Corporation doing business as AAA Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bradley v. Stitt
as 5:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Allen R Bradley
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brotherson v. Galloway et al
as 5:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Brotherson
Defendant:
Samantha Galloway and Kevin Corbett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peoples v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Kevin Peoples
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pope v. Buchanan
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Joey Edward Pope
Defendant:
Kevin Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooper v. Stitt
as 5:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
JD Hooper
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blankenship et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
John Hayden Blankenship, Haylee Blankenship, Delsie Mae Pye and others
Defendant:
John Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Stitt et al
as 4:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Officer DeShields, Officer Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Hurman Lee Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt and John OConnor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
