Cases 71 - 80 of 88
USA v. Stephen Leavins
as 14-50455
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN LEAVINS
Reginald Holston v. C. Laflam, et al
as 14-90013
Petitioner:
REGINALD L. HOLSTON
Respondent:
C. LAFLAM, individually and in official capacity as a correctional Sergeant at HCI, J. HELSLEY, individually and in official capacity as a correctional Sergeant at HCI, AARON LEAVINS, individually and in official capacity as the Warden at H.C.I. and others
USA v. Stephen Leavin
as 14-50184
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN LEAVINS
Holston v. Laflam et al
as 8:2014cv00704
Plaintiff:
Reginald Holston
Defendant:
C. Laflam, J. Helsley, Aaron Leavins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leavine et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11566
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Leavine and Gary W. Leavine
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00330
Petitioner:
Crosley Alexander Green
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and Donald A. Leavins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karnes et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32464
Plaintiff:
Barbara Karnes , Kerry Karnes , Kathleen Harding and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holston v. Laflam et al
as 8:2013cv02387
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Holston
Defendant:
Sgt. Laflam, Officer Helsley, Aaron Leavins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karnes et al v. C.R. Bard, INC.
as MOE/4:13-cv-01681
Plaintiff:
Barbara Karnes , Kerry Karnes , Kathleen Harding and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc.
Karnes et al v. C.R. Bard, INC.
as 4:2013cv01681
Plaintiff:
Barbara Karnes , Kerry Karnes , Kathleen Harding and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
