Cases 71 - 80 of 587
Lewis v. Fitz
as 2:2021cv02770
Petitioner:
Terrance Jerome Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. $2,408.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2021cv02727
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$2,408.00 in United States Currency and One (1) Intratec Protec -25 Handgun, Serial Number: 01921B
Claimant:
Michael Taylor, Yulonda Taylor, Anthony Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Lewis et al v. Montgomery County Jail Staff et al
as 3:2021cv00859
Plaintiff:
Jamarris Lewis, Donald Doss and Hamid Houbbadi
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail Staff and Southern Health Partners Nurses Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nichols et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Harold Wayne Nichols and Jonathan Stephenson
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Jane or John Doe, Tony Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Mays et al
as 3:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Jones
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Ernest Lewis, George Firestine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dylan Murray
Defendant:
Chan's Frame and Body Shop, LLC, John Mark Roberts, Casey Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kuntz et al v. Garrison et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rachel L Kuntz, R.D.B. and Britton Ashton Bowers
Defendant:
Amanda Burke Garrison, Chad Lewis and Andrea Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Gallatin Chicken LLC
as 3:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Aeyisha Lewis
Defendant:
Gallatin Chicken LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
