Cases 71 - 80 of 271
McDonald et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-23565
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. McDonald and James McDonald
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
MCDONALD v. COPPERTHWAITE, III et al
as 3:2013cv05559
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. MCDONALD
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. COPPERTHWAITE, III, NANCY COPPERTHWAITE, WILLIAM H. COPPERTHWAITE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. APPLETON PAPERS INC. RETIREMENT PLAN et al
as 3:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
LONIE M. MCDONALD
Defendant:
APPLETON PAPERS INC. RETIREMENT PLAN and KERRY ARENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Anna Tanguay et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05937
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings Inc, American Medical Systems Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Arnold, Patricia Ann Babb-Farrow, Dolores Baker and others
Anna Tanguay et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-05937
Plaintiff:
Anna Tanguay , Saundra Brown , Jennifer Heiser and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc , American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. McDonald, III, et al.
as 5:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Edward K. McDonald, III, Bertha M. McDonald and E. F. Boyd & Son Funeral Home
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Murphy v. California Department of Corrections, et al
as 2:2013cv00710
Petitioner:
John Paul Murphy
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections, M. Cate and M. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Smith v. M. McDonald
as 13-15474
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES RAY SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
M. MCDONALD, Warden
Freddie Williamson v. M. McDonald
as 13-15113
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDDIE LEE WILLIAMSON
Respondent - Appellee:
M. MCDONALD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
