Cases 71 - 80 of 110
MARTIN v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2014cv00836
Respondent:
GRACE BROWN, CORIZON HEALTH, AARON CUNNINGHAM and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey Rowe v. Autumn Brown, et al
as 14-2111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY A. ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTUMN BROWN, WESLEY J. CARLILE, Correctional Officer, DEBORAH WALLEN and others
Keel v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 3:2014cv01492
Plaintiff:
Jason Andrew Keel
Defendant:
Michael Mitcheff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LATHAM v. WOLFE et al
as 1:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
LARRY EUGENE LATHAM
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, ROSE VAISVILAS and WILLIAM WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DURHAM
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and MICHAEL MITCHEFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matson v. Tippecanoe County Indiana et al
as 4:2014cv00014
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Indiana , Tippecanoe Sheriff's Department , Tracy Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Matson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANCLEAVE v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2013cv01586
Defendant:
ARAMARK, BARNES, ROBERT BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL K. VANCLEAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. HALE et al
as 2:2013cv00335
Defendant:
BLACKMAN, CORIZON, INC., MARLA GADBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY THOMPSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard DeWitt v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 13-2930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD DEWITT
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Correctional Medical Services, Inc., PATTI WIRTH, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
CARR v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2013cv01298
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, MARLA GADBERRY, KIM GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
