Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Morris, Michael v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael Morris
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections , Gary Boughton, Kartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Moore et al
as 2:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Tony Scott
Defendant:
CO Moore and Lt Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris, Shari v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2016cv00789
Plaintiff:
Shari A. Morris
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Morris v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2016cv01243
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Macy's Inc and Group Policy Number VDT-980012
Plaintiff:
Cynthia G Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Morris, Fredrick v. Zeimer, Jason et al
as 3:2016cv00625
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Andrew Morris
Defendant:
Jason T. Zeimer and Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perket, Scot v. Pappas, Paul et al
as 3:2016cv00586
Plaintiff:
Scot Alan Perket
Defendant:
Paul Pappas, Verve Credit Union and Mount Morris Mutual of Coloma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perket, Scot v. La Crosse County Jail Deputies et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Scot Alan Perket
Defendant:
La Crosse County Jail Deputies, Tax Assessor and Mount Morris Mutual Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goettl, Victor et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Victor Goettl , Darden Bridgeforth & Sons , Bridgeforth Farms and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
