Cases 71 - 80 of 90
UNITED STATES v. BOYAJIAN et al
as 2:2010cv01812
Defendant:
JACK H. BOYAJIAN, HELEN BOYAJIAN, HELEN BOYADJIAN and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Freadman v. First Alert 1 et al
as 1:2010cv10236
Plaintiff:
Marv Freadman
Defendant:
First Alert 1, The American Water Service, LLC, Industrial Test Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Freadman v. Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2010cv10126
Plaintiff:
Marv Freadman
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Hubbard v. O'Connor et al
as 0:2010cv60031
Plaintiff:
Marv Antonio Hubbard
Defendant:
Eileen M. O'Connor, Paul L. Backman, Michael J. Satz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Freadman v. Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc.,
as 1:2009cv11442
Plaintiff:
Marv Freadman
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Freadman v. Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc.
as 1:2009cv11266
Plaintiff:
Marv Freadman
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Freadman v. Kimberly-Clark Worldwide,Inc.
as 1:2009cv11145
Plaintiff:
Marv Freadman
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Freadman v. Aurora Analytics, LLC
as 1:2009cv10703
Plaintiff:
Marv Freadman
Defendant:
Aurora Analytics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Zimmerman et al v. Roche et al
as 1:2009cv00605
Plaintiff:
James Zimmerman, James Zimmerman, James Zimmerman and others
Defendant:
Robert R. Roche, Robert R. Roche, Ashford S. McAllister and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
