Cases 71 - 80 of 145
Mosely v. IRS Whistleblower's Office et al
as 4:2013cv04085
Plaintiff:
Tommy Mosely
Defendant:
IRS Whistleblower's Office, Marvin Evans and William Straughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2013cv00289
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Marvin Evans, Jr, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Corizon Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
James Ken Anderson
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Sonya A Pepper-Davis, Jacqueline R Carswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Mosby v. Larry May, et al
as 13-2815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger D. Mosby
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry May, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, ADC, Larry Norris, Former Director, ADC and others
Croston v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Detrick D Croston
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs, Marvin Evans, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Kelly et al
as 5:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Nicola Kelly, William Straugh, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Straughn et al
as 5:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
William Straughn, Steve Outlaw, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. May et al
as 5:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Roger D Mosby
Defendant:
Larry B May, Marvin Evans, Jr, Larry B Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Budnik et al
as 1:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Perry
Defendant:
Christopher T Budnik, Ryon C Hennessey, John Maples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Chierre Jones
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, William Straughn, Maurice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
