Cases 71 - 80 of 132
Caplan v. MATTRESS FIRM, INC. et al
as 9:2019cv81561
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
11865 HWY. ONE ASSOCIATES, LLC and MATTRESS FIRM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, ATTORNEY IN FACT FOR G.F. v. MATTRESS FIRM , INC. MEDICAL PLAN et al
as 2:2019cv08953
Defendant:
MATTRESS FIRM, INC. MEDICAL PLAN, ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, P.A., JOHN DOE 1-100(a fictitious designation for unknown persons) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zabala v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 6:2018cv01671
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos Zabala
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McCulloh v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 3:2018cv05805
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Spencer McCulloh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC et al v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02147
Plaintiff:
Dan-Foam ApS, Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC and Tempur-Pedic Management, LLC.
Defendant:
Sinomax Group Limited, Ther-A-Pedic Associates, Inc., Mattress Firm, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv81056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Doe v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc. and One Source Technology LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Herrera v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv20267
Plaintiff:
Rafael Herrera
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc. , Edwin V. Delivery Services, Inc. and Edwin Vindas
Mediator:
Marlene Quintana and Karen Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
