Cases 71 - 80 of 2,648
MCCALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19171
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCCALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glidewell v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Glidewell
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Salmon et al
as 1:2023cv04382
Plaintiff:
Shawndia Eliesse Rogers
Defendant:
John L. Salmon, Jr. and Mark McCall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
MCCALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03714
Plaintiff:
DAVEION MCCALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Triplett, et al. v. McCall Aviation, Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Lisa Triplett, Amanda Keech, Jessica Weaver and others
Defendant:
McCall Aviation, Inc., Teton Leasing, LLC and Bryan Grey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Airline Crash
Isbill v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
George Isbill
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stewart
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Larry Chaney
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. William Calhoun, Jr.
as 23-3150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William McCall Calhoun, Jr.
Mccall v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09824
Plaintiff:
Barbara Mccall
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
