Cases 71 - 80 of 169
Davis v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01153
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Davis
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Other Unknown Employees of the Illinois Department of Corrections, Jon Sandage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fly v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phares v. McLean County Illinois
as 1:2018cv01112
Plaintiff:
Seth Phares
Defendant:
McLean County Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. McLean County Circuit Clerk
as 1:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Houston Rudolph
Defendant:
McLean County Circuit Clerk, J Karnats and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Catlin Indemnity Company v. Goeke et al
as 1:2018cv01047
Plaintiff:
Catlin Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Karl A Goeke, Jean Swanson, Charles Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Menken v. McLean County State's Attorney Office et al
as 1:2017cv01565
Plaintiff:
Eric James Menken
Defendant:
McLean County State's Attorney Office, . Goldrick, . Freitag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin Bartlett v. Kenneth Inoue, et al
as 17-2507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARTLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH INOUE, Doctor, JEANENE PAYNE, Nurse, CHERYL STURGILL, Nurse and others
Wallace v. McLean County Jail
as 1:2017cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jatouris Wallace
Defendant:
McLean County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Hosea v. McLean County Jury Commission, et al
as 17-1225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON HOSEA
Defendant - Appellee:
MCLEAN COUNTY JURY COMMISSION and JOHN & JANE DOES, unknown with the McLean County Jury Commission
Bartlett v. McLean County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01050
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J Bartlett
Defendant:
McLean County Jail and Jamey Kessinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
