Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Worsham v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Worsham
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc. and Alliance Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Phelps v. Monitronics International, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Marc Phelps
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Monitronics International, Inc. v. ADT, LLC
as 1:2016mc00017
Movant:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Respondent:
ADT, LLC
Worsham v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Worsham
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc. and Alliance Security Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Colletti v. Monitronics International Inc
as 0:2015cv04838
Plaintiff:
Valerie Colletti
Defendant:
Monitronics International Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Schweizer v. Monitronics International, Inc.
as 6:2015cv01977
Plaintiff:
Michael Schweizer
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Monitronics International, Inc. v. Hall, Booth, Smith, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv03927
Plaintiff:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Defendant:
Hall, Booth, Smith, P.C. and James H. Fisher, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
General Security, Inc. v. Elite Home Security LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
General Security, Inc.
Defendant:
Elite Home Security LLC, Northstar Alarm Services, LLC, Monitronics International, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. The Altitude Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
The Altitude Group, LLC, Ryan Neill, Kevin Brody and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Newhart v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Plaintiff:
Darren R. Newhart
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc. and Alliance Security Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
