Cases 71 - 80 of 566
Brittingham v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
Danny N. Brittingham
Defendant:
Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barksdale v. Gurley et al
as 1:2021cv00914
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Barksdale
Defendant:
Jerry N Gurley, Amy Brown, Shea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Bates et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Mitchell
Defendant:
Dr. Gurlee, Nurse Terry, Dr. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Social Security Adminstration
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mr Patrick Antwain Giles
Defendant:
N/A N/A N/A Social Security Adminstration, N/A
Stanley v. Gemini Group Inc. D.B.A. Midsouth Extrusion Die
as 3:2021cv00421
Defendant:
Gemini Group Inc. D.B.A. Midsouth Extrusion Die
Plaintiff:
Jonathan N. Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
The State of Alabama et al v. United States Department of Commerce et al
as 3:2021cv00211
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Ron Jarmin, United States Bureau of the Census and others
Plaintiff:
William Green, Robert Aderholt, The State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
Aleksandra Slavkovic, State of Utah, Aaron Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Neves et al
as 5:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Justin Devonterrious Jones
Defendant:
Lieber and N Neves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
