Cases 71 - 80 of 181
Barge v. O'Neal
as 4:2017cv02293
Plaintiff:
Arthur Barge
Defendant:
Thomas O'Neal, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. Cannon et al
as 6:2017cv02002
Plaintiff:
Craig R Neal
Defendant:
J Al Cannon, Jr and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal Constructors LLC v. Arencibia Associates Inc
as 6:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
O'Neal Constructors LLC
Defendant:
Arencibia Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cash-Davis et al v. Access Community Rehabilitative Behavorial Health Services et al
as 3:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Clare Cash-Davis, Bernard Ceasar, Carolyn Neal and others
Defendant:
Access Community Rehabilitative Behavorial Health Services and Jembralyn Jones
Counter_claimant:
Jembralyn Jones and Access Community Rehabilitative Behavorial Health Services
Counter_defendant:
Bernard Ceasar, Carolyn Neal and Tawanda Taylor-White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cantrell v. Rossignol Ski Company Inc
as 8:2016cv03959
Plaintiff:
Cindy Neal Cantrell
Defendant:
Rossignol Ski Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pronin v. Wright et al
as 5:2016cv03635
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
Charles Wright, Neal Urch, Ashley McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vicky Chaffee et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03631
Plaintiff:
Vicky Chaffee , Judith Adkins , Ruby Allen and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Grizzell v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 6:2016cv03558
Plaintiff:
Neal Grizzell
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Adams v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03448
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Neal Adams
Defendant:
Ben Sander, Drew Walensky and Family Dollar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Flowers et al
as 4:2016cv03305
Plaintiff:
Justin Martin Jackson
Defendant:
Neal Flowers, Ben Weatherford and Darlington County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
