Cases 71 - 80 of 544
GAITHER v. DEAL et al
as 4:2021cv00034
Defendant:
WARDEN PHILBIN, Deputy Warden PASCAL, Deputy Warden HARVEY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GAITHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Deal et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Mr. Pascal, Mrs. Harvey, Nathan Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Link et al
as 1:2021cv00804
Defendant:
Nathan Link, Lauren Link and Thomas Habeeb
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grissom v. The Govt. of China et al
as 1:2021cv00450
Plaintiff:
Nathan LaRon Grissom
Defendant:
The Govt. of China, GEO Correction and U S Govt. Congress a Senate Legislature and Judicial under The U S Treasury Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crisp v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Tuwanda Rush Williams, Brittanie Browning, David D. Pritchett and others
Plaintiff:
Sergeant Nathan D. Crisp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watts et al v. Jones
as 3:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
Justin Wade Watts
Defendant:
Judge Bill Hamerick, Jason Jones and Nathan Stewart
Respondent:
Terry Langely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SEATS v. MAJORS et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Defendant:
OFFICER BRANDON TEMPLES, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER NATHAN MAJORS and others
Plaintiff:
MOSES SOLOMON ISAIAH SEATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Deal et al
as 1:2020cv04400
Defendant:
Robert Downs, Alan Seilbeck, Dustin Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
