Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Conservative Party Of New York State et al v. New York State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv06923
Plaintiff: Conservative Party Of New York State and Working Families Party
Defendant: New York State Board of Elections, James A. Walsh, Douglas A. Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
United States of America v. State of New York
as 10-3602
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: George Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, New York State Board of Elections, Peter S. Kosinski, Deputy Executive Director of the New York State Board of Elections and others
Defendant - Appellant: State of New York, University of the State of New York, Richard P. Mills, President of the University of the State of New York and Commissioner of the New York State Education Department and others
Voice of Teacher Education / Committee on Political Education et al v. New York State Board Of Elections et al
as 1:2010cv00961
Plaintiff: Voice of Teacher Education / Committee on Political Education , Andrew Pallotta , New York State United Teachers and others
Defendant: New York State Board Of Elections , James A. Walsh , Douglas A. Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Schulz v. State of New York
as 10-2726
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert L. Schulz and John Liggett
Defendant - Appellee: State of New York, Douglas Kellner, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections, Evelyn Aquila and others
NAACP New York State Conference et al v. New York State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02950
Defendant: Evelyn J. Aquila, Jose Miguel Araujo, Naomi Barrera and others
Plaintiff: Vivian Bosier, Anita Burson, Sheila Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. The Catskill Center for Indepe
as 10-2320
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Cross-Claimant: Nassau County Legislature
Defendant: The Catskill Center for Independence
Intervenor: Larry Rockefeller, Stephen DeWitt, Henry J. Nicols and others
Defendant - Appellant: New York State Board of Elections, Todd D. Valentine, Co-Executive-Directors of the New York State Board of Elections, in their official capacities, Stanley L. Zalen, co-Executive Directors of the New York State Board of Elections, in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00652
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McMillan v. New York State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02502
Plaintiff: James E. McMillan, III
Defendant: New York City Board of Elections and New York State Board of Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nassau County Board of Elections et al v. County Of Nassau We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01659
Defendant: Evelyn A. Aquila, Douglas A. Kellner, New York State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: William T. Biamonte, County Of Nassau, John A. Degrace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff: Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee: The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?