Cases 71 - 80 of 233
NICHOLS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 4:2018cv00187
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CARR and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
SHANE NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Rabun County Detention et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael Jonathan Nichols
Defendant:
Sgt Presti and Rabun County Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henegar v. Georgia Correctional Health, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00192
Defendant:
Lieutenant Stroh, Augusta University, Sergeant Keith and others
Plaintiff:
David Henegar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. First Franklin Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv04321
Defendant:
First Franklin Financial Corp., Richard P. Maner, P.C., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nichole Rose Turner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aceves v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03343
Defendant:
Eugene Nichols, Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. and Protective Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jonatan Ledesma Aceves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICHOLS
as 7:2018cv00106
Defendant:
JUDY S NICHOLS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Nichols v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02872
Plaintiff:
Douglas Nichols
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dale v. RBR Enterprise, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nichole Dale
Defendant:
RBR Enterprise, LLC and Crenlo Cab Products, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Champion Law Group, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01786
Plaintiff:
Nicole Nichols
Defendant:
Champion Law Group, LLC and Sean R. Campbell-Champion
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
MCLEOD v. DUKES et al
as 7:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
