Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 194
Montgomery v. Rainier Beach Pool et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02035
Defendant: Seattle Office of Civil Rights, Jenny A Durkan, Mariko Lockhart and others
Plaintiff: Allan Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kastner et al v. Tri State Eye et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2019cv10668
Plaintiff: Joseph Kastner and John and Jane Doe 1-20
Defendant: CIGNA, The EEOC, Town of Middletown NY Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant: Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae: the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff: National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association and Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae: the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party: Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff: Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant: Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant: Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Carithers v. Schriver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02676
Defendant: California Judicial Counsel, Carlos Romos, Kathy Peters and others
Plaintiff: Biron M. Carithers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transgender Law Center et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2019cv03032
Plaintiff: Transgender Law Center and JOLENE K YOUNGERS
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security - Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Julian Owens v. University of South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1183
Defendant / Appellee: HARRIS PASTIDES, HEATHER BRANDT, MICHAEL AMIRIDIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JULIAN D. OWENS
Flores v. State of Hawaii et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00315
Defendant: Isemoto Construction Co, Hawaii Dept of Transportation Office of Civil Rights, Southland Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff: Xochi Quetzal Haena Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?