Cases 71 - 80 of 128
Forster v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00913
Plaintiff:
Peggy Forster
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushing v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00895
Plaintiff:
Peggy Rushing
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00819
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Plaintiff:
Peggy McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BASKIN et al v. BOGAN et al
as 1:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
MARILYN RAE BASKIN, DAWN LYNN CARVER, PAMELA RUTH ELEASE EANES and others
Defendant:
PEGGY BEAVER, PENNY BOGAN, MICHAEL A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00221
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Plaintiff:
PEGGY JO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MAPLE v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01697
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
PEGGY M. MAPLE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
