Cases 71 - 80 of 18,856
Purnell v. Mac's Convenience Stores LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
Pamela Purnell
Defendant:
Mac's Convenience Stores LLC, Shell Oil Products Company LLC and Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ROACH v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06191
Plaintiff:
PAMELA ROACH
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hulett v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hulett
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Messal v. Department of Agriculture
as 24-1817
Petitioner:
PAMELA MESSAL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Ridgeway v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Clifton Marshall Ridgeway
Defendant:
Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wong v. Target Corporation
as 8:2024cv01184
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wong
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McMinn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Pamela May McMinn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RAMIREZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06135
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ARTURO RAMIREZ and THE ESTATE OF PAMELA J. RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
