Cases 71 - 80 of 98
United States of America v. Riley et al
as 2:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anita S. Riley and Unknown Spouse of Anita S. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 5:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roark v. Robertson et al
as 5:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Cecil Roark, II
Defendant:
Tammy Robertson, Rickey Riley, Bryan Hollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Riley
as 5:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Claude R. Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Johnathan Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Riley et al
as 5:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Patrick Simpson
Defendant:
Natalie Riley, Amanda L. Hughes and Hickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. Hungness et al
as 5:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ramirez
Defendant:
Dr. Hungness, Dr. Masterson, Dr. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Papaioan v. Riley et al
as 5:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Mihail I. Papaioan
Defendant:
Natalie C. Riley, Amanda Hughes, Rick Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Riley v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 2:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
Johnie Riley
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois and Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tramber v. Phelps et al
as 5:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Stephon Tramber
Defendant:
Bob Phelps, Tammy Robertson and Rick Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall et al v. McCracken County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
Monica Hall and Candace Riley
Defendant:
McCracken County, Kentucky, Bill Adams, Keith Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
