Cases 71 - 80 of 344
HAGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61942
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES HAGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUCKETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54236
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES PUCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PACHECANO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54002
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES PACHECANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRAWDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49462
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES DRAWDY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURTON II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95549
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES BURTON II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randle v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00237
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Richard James Randle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv81369
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davern v. Broward County, Florida et al
as 0:2020cv60502
Defendant:
Javier Morales, Broward County, Florida, Angel Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Davern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75311
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard James Gabaldon v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Richard James Gabaldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
