Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 71 - 80 of 635
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00417
Plaintiff: ROGER DALE GODWIN, ADEEB OMAR ASAMA LAIDEN and ADEEB OMAR OSAMA LAIDEN
Defendant: DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON, EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00342
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00400
Plaintiff: ROGER DALE GODWIN
Defendant: D. HOLMES, EDWARDS and SIS STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRINGLE v. WARDEN
as 3:2021cv00147
Petitioner: ROGER PRINGLE
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Finnegan v. Foerg et al
as 3:2021cv00783
Defendant: Jeffery K Richwine, Dale J Starkes, Phillip Foerg and others
Plaintiff: Russell Grant Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2021cv02328
Plaintiff: EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Defendant: MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ROGERS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2021cv02216
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Defendant: PAUL A. TALBOT, ELAINE PURDUE and CHRISTINA CONYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAINTIGNON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00334
Plaintiff: DANNY LEE SAINTIGNON, Jr.
Defendant: WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, RAJOLI, TAYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Kitts II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00567
Plaintiff: Hakeem Halajawon Rose
Defendant: Stephen Roger Kitts II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff: DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant: RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?