Cases 71 - 80 of 494
King v. Wilson
as 4:2018cv00868
Petitioner:
Ronald King
Respondent:
Eric A Wilson and Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fulgham v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00706
Defendant:
Director, Coordinator, Superintendent of the Pearl Public or Private Waterworks, Ronald King and Pelicia Hall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daaryl Fulgham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hales v. King et al
as 2:2018cv00171
Defendant:
Central Mississippi Correctional Facility and Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Sam Hales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00648
Defendant:
Ronald King, Director of Pearl Water Association and Pelicia Hall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Darwin L. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ronald King
as 18-30974
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD KING, also known as Big
Alford v. King et al
as 1:2018cv00150
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Ronald King
Petitioner:
Lasharis Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCullum v. King
as 4:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Cedric McCullum
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin et al v. American Marine Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01014
Plaintiff:
Glenn Goodwin and Ronald King
Defendant:
American Marine Express, Inc. , Gurai Leasing Company, LLC , Intermodal Facilities Group, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Covington v. Hall, et al
as 3:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Covington
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Ronald King, Pearl Public & Private Water Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easterling v. The Pearl Water Association et al
as 3:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Fontrel Easterling, Sr.
Defendant:
The Commissioner of the M.D.O.C. (Mississippi), Ronald King, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
