Cases 71 - 80 of 253
O'Briant v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2018cv02614
Defendant:
Catherine Pugh, Baltimore City Police Department, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip O'Briant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olymbec USA LLC v. CWFS Insight LLC, et al
as 8:2018cv02606
Defendant:
John Doe Members of Lenox Park B, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., CWFS Insight LLC and others
Interested Party:
Donna Russell
Plaintiff:
Olymbec USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
El Ali et al v. Sessions et al
as 8:2018cv02415
Defendant:
James W. McCament, Ken Blanco, General Paul M. Nakasone and others
Plaintiff:
Hawa Wehelie, Mutasem Jardaneh, Faraz Siddiqui and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
DeCarlo et al v. Fisher et al
as 1:2018cv02192
Plaintiff:
Walter Weiss, Alan Childs, Allen Roberts and others
Defendant:
Baltimore County and R. Jay Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rice et al v. SalonCentric, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01980
Plaintiff:
Penny S. Rice and Russell Rice
Defendant:
SalonCentric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carrington v. USA - 2255
as 1:2018cv01910
Petitioner:
Russell Carrington
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01648
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Prince George's County Maryland v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 8:2018cv00870
Plaintiff:
Prince George's County Maryland
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Russell et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00660
Plaintiff:
Michael H Russell and Sherry Russell
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
