Cases 71 - 80 of 5,498
Smith v. County of Niagara et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith
Defendant:
County of Niagara, Kyle R. Andrews in his official capacity as treasurer for Niagara County and Kyle R. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
Patrick A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02821
Petitioner:
Jayquan Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Joseph v. Escobar Hernandez et al
as 1:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Sherwin S. Joseph
Defendant:
Cristian Jose Escobar Hernandez, JDM LOGISTICS LLC, Samantha Altius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. Baron et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Dennis William Smith
Defendant:
Henryk Baron, Tripar Transportation, LP and Tripar Transportation GP Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Smith, Ltd. v. Paramount Global et al
as 1:2024cv01788
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smith, Ltd.
Defendant:
Paramount Global and Showtime Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Smith v. Goodman
as 2:2024cv01353
Petitioner:
Jua Smith
Respondent:
Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
