Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Radley v. Thomas et al
as 3:2009cv00579
Plaintiff:
James Radley
Defendant:
Tiara Thomas, Connie Melnyczenko, L East and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carnes v. Carnes et al
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
John M Carnes
Defendant:
Lynette A Rice, Rice Family, Thomas Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VALDEZ v. MONTANA SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2009cv01323
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO VALDEZ
Respondent:
MONTANA SUPREME COURT, JON KEVIN REID, KIMBERLY J. DEL GRECO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. ROBERTS et al
as 3:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE ALLEN
Defendant:
ROBERTS, AL PARKE, GILBERT PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
COOPER v. CHANCE et al
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
ANDREW COOPER
Defendant:
MIS CHANCE, BIG SANDY, HAMICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JONES v. C.M.S- MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2008cv01517
Plaintiff:
GORDON JONES
Defendant:
C.M.S- MEDICAL SERVICES, DOCTOR DIANE ELROD, CONNIE JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holland et al v. Hissu et al
as 3:2007cv00632
Plaintiff:
Donald Holland and Sandy Holland
Defendant:
Abdulqaadir Ibrahim Hissu, Abdulqaadir Ibrahim Hissu, Werner Enterprises Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WHATLEY v. CHARDONNEY DIALYSIS INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01492
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. WHATLEY, SR.
Defendant:
CHARDONNEY DIALYSIS INC., DR. MISHLER NEPHRO and NURSE SANDI DODSON R.N.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
