Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Rhodes v. City of King County et al
as 2:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rhodes
Defendant:
City of King County, Seattle Police Department and Christopher Jaron Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Richards et al
as 2:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Sean D Anderson
Defendant:
Allen K Richards, Seattle Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omari Tahir v. Ian Eisenberg, et al
as 16-36028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMARI TAHIR, AKA James C. Garrett
Defendant - Appellee:
IAN EISENBERG, AKA Uncle Ike's, STATE OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
Canty v. King County et al
as 2:2016cv01655
Plaintiff:
Kyle Lydell Canty
Defendant:
King County, Seattle Police Department, City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tahir v. Eisenberg et al
as 2:2016cv01621
Plaintiff:
Omari Tahir
Defendant:
Ian Eisenberg, State of Washington, Seattle Public Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Versaterm Inc. v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2016cv01217
Plaintiff:
Versaterm Inc
Defendant:
City of Seattle and Seattle Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Seattle Police Department
as 2:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Michael James Moore
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Heidi Catherine Miller
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Victoria Faine, Mildred Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Novasky v. Clinton et al
as 2:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Paul H Novasky
Defendant:
Adam C Clinton, Jacob W Briskey, Christopher G Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuller et al v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv01837
Plaintiff:
Michael B Fuller
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Ronald English, Larry Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
