Cases 71 - 80 of 530
Taylor v. Prichard
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Donald Taylor
Defendant:
Andrew Prichard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Melony Taylor
Defendant:
Eric Smith, Annett Holdings, Inc. doing business as TMC Transportation and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Annett Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. USA
as 2:2022cv00010
Petitioner:
Pierre R. Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robertson v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Brandon Robertson
Defendant:
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government doing business as Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Darrell Taylor, Jr. and Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00084
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Barm Combs, Patricia Combs, Allen Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tyler v. Maze et al
as 0:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Tyler
Defendant:
Irv Maze, Larry Thompson, Joy Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Taylor et al
as 6:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason
Defendant:
Deputy Justin Taylor and Sgt. John Inman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leiser v. Lake Barkley Marina, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Lake Barkley Marina, Inc., Jimme Keevan Taylor, MSR & Associates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Krystle Leiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Taylor v. Ashby et al
as 3:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Taylor
Defendant:
Major William Ashby and Director Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis et al v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2021cv00658
Plaintiff:
Steven Curtis and Zaman Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Rutherford, Officer Mark Batson, Officer Donald Hillerich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ra
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
