Cases 71 - 80 of 355
Virden v. City of Austin
as 21-50597
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer Virden
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Austin, Texas
Quiroz et al v. Pineda et al
as 1:2021cv00443
Plaintiff:
E. F. Q., Jasmine Quiroz, Enrique Quiroz and others
Defendant:
Spencer Hanna, CITY OF AUSTIN and Eduardo Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodero et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Edgar Vargas Dodero and Gilda Falconi
Defendant:
City Of Austin and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA v. MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. et al
as 4:2021cv00057
Defendant:
MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. UNITED STATES, MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC. WASHINGTON D.C. and MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Big Fish Entertainment LLC v. Williamson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 5, Doe 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Big Fish Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00249
Defendant:
John Does and City of Austin
Plaintiff:
Tyree Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Springs-Hutchinson et al v. The City of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00221
Defendant:
Thomas Bernard Nelson, III, Dane O'Neill, DeAndre Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Springs-Hutchinson and Benny Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mannie v. Gentry et al
as 1:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
Paul Mannie
Defendant:
Chance Bretches, Gregory Gentry and City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nuno-Trevino v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00187
Defendant:
Matthew Hattaway, City of Austin and John-Matthew Hattaway
Plaintiff:
Linda Nuno-Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeSilva v. Taylor et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Defendant:
Karl Krycia, City of Austin and Christopher Taylor
Plaintiff:
Athige Denzil DeSilva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
