Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Benedetti v. University of Connecticut et al
as 3:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
George W. Benedetti
Defendant:
University of Connecticut, Center for Science and Technology Commercialization and Michael F. Newborg
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Vega v. Rell
as 14-137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joe Burgos Vega
Defendant:
Steven R. Strom, I/O, Keefe Supply Co, I/O, Allscents U.S.A., I/O and others
Defendant - Appellee:
M. Jodi Rell, I/O, Richard Blumenthal, Theresa Lantz, I/O and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01800
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ASANTE THREE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER, et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01690
Plaintiff:
ASANTE THREE RIVERS MEDICAL CENTER , ASANTE ROUGE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , SOUTHEAST GEORGIA HEALTH SYSTEM BRUNSWICK CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
In Re: Request for PACER Exemption Fees for Prof. Samuel Martinez, University of Connecticut, Department of Anthropology
as 1:2013mc91191
Movant:
Prof. Samuel Martinez, University of Connecticut
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
