Cases 71 - 80 of 3,964
Johnson v. Harnett County Detention Center
as 5:2024ct03046
Plaintiff:
William Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard Automatics, Inc. v. Houser
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Leonard Automatics, Inc.
Defendant:
William C. Houser
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Donail Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Boyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2024ct03053
Plaintiff:
Harold Boyd, Jr
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Major Price, Batman Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stacey Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Daniels v. USA
as 5:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
William Isaac Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hannagan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
William Hannagan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Russell v. Rice et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Herbert P. Russell
Defendant:
Fred Rice and William D. West doing business as Klassic Rides, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
