Cases 71 - 80 of 484
Bonds v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv04034
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Reid Bonds
Defendant:
Captain Golden Adams, Steven King, Nurse Chelsea Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv04035
Plaintiff:
Eric Demond Russell
Defendant:
Captain Adams, Sergeant Golden, Correctional Officer Mrs. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Francisco Beard
Defendant:
Adams, Baker, Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. Runion et al
as 4:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion, Warden Jeffie Walker, Captain G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Walker et al v. Martin Transportation Systems Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Walker and Tabitha Walker
Defendant:
Martin Transportation Systems Inc and Linda Riggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McCormack v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reid, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv04005
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Walker, Sergeant Golden and Miller County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Walker Chapman
Defendant:
Dwayne Hendrix, Yates and Hoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
