Cases 71 - 80 of 473
Drummond v. Proctor et al
as 2:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Adam Drummond
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Proctor, Larry Phelps, Corporal Jordan Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SNEED v. WATSON
as 7:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SNEED
Defendant:
ANITA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. NORMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
JIMMY NORMAN, STEVEN CARTER and BO DOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. WAY et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
JESSE WAY, JR and WESTOVER LAWN AND GARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. CITY OF ALBANY et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBANY, MAYOR BO DOROUGH, CHIEF MICHAEL J PERSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAW LIBRARY et al
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAW LIBRARY, MICHAEL MCCOY, STEVEN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Shantel Watson
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kiss v. Watson et al
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Kiss
Defendant:
Deputy Ryan Watson, Major Chris Matthews, Sheriff Gerald Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
