Cases 71 - 80 of 1,626
Seabolt v. Wray et al
as 7:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gratton Seabolt
Defendant:
Major Wray, Captain Smith, Mrs. Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00743
Petitioner:
Dayomic J. Smith
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and D. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Stout et al
as 3:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Wesley Edward Smith, III
Defendant:
Walter W. Stout, Robert A. Dybing, Bevill Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Moore v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Mr. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pendleton v. DiMatteo et al
as 3:2023cv00734
Petitioner:
Jonathan Pendleton
Respondent:
Louise DiMatteo, Paul Ferguson and Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Newman, et al.
as 3:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donna H. Watson
Defendant:
Richard Keith Newman, Lieutenant Jacquita Rachelle Allen, John F. Keohane, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenon v. Levelle et al
as 3:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bryant Kenon
Defendant:
Thomas Dervis Levelle, Harey Smith, Jr. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Susan C Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Artrip et al
as 7:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
