Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 130
Howard v. City of Ridgecrest
as 1:2012at00501
Plaintiff: William Dale Howard
Defendant: City of Ridgecrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Larsen et al
as 4:2012cv02217
Plaintiff: William Dale Carter
Defendant: Michael Larsen, Hardilek, Ms. Takac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. William Newhoff, Jr.
as 12-35485
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM DALE NEWHOFF, Jr.
Bodle et al v. TXL Mortgage Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv01515
Plaintiff: Ambre Bodle, Leslie Meech and Lori Prince
Defendant: William Dale Couch and TXL Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carter v. Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles
as 3:2012cv03118
Petitioner: William Dale Carter
Respondent: Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv01358
Petitioner: William Dale Carter
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv01299
Petitioner: William Dale Carter
Respondent: Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newhoff v. USA
as 9:2012cv00054
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: William Dale Newhoff, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carter v. Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv00317
Petitioner: William Dale Carter
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv00304
Petitioner: William Dale Carter
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: Texas State Board Of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?