Cases 71 - 80 of 734
Mason et al v. City of Clarksdale et al
as 4:2020cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ladayton Williams, Willie Joe Safford, Sharon Wade and others
Defendant:
Coahoma County Sheriff's Office, Eric Bilbro, Master Sergeant Marcus Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newby et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2020cv00254
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Anitra Newby and Willie Newby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Willis v. Thomas et al
as 4:2020cv00157
Plaintiff:
Bo Willis
Defendant:
Johnny W. Thomas and Waste Pro of Mississippi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00281
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie James Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ables v. Knighten et al
as 4:2020cv00154
Defendant:
Angela Brown, Centurion of MS, LLC, Vicky Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Jon J. Ables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al v. Willis et al
as 3:2020cv00559
Defendant:
Danita Darlene Willis, Deanna Johnson and Deanna John
Plaintiff:
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McMillian v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00130
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Audey McAffe
Plaintiff:
Willie C. McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Evans v. USA
as 3:2020cv00465
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Willie Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. UFP Haleyville, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Bo Willis and UFP Haleyville, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. Willis et al
as 3:2020cv00404
Defendant:
Mary Willis, John and Jane Does 1-10, Missy Mulconrey and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
