Cases 71 - 80 of 474,963
TRUSTEES OF THE IRON WORKERS' LOCAL NO. 25 PENSION FUND et al v. METRO ELEVATOR COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024mc00021
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Swan v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03736
Plaintiff:
Latisha Swan
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Evans v. L Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03732
Plaintiff:
Virginia Gail Evans
Defendant:
L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Swan v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03735
Plaintiff:
Latisha Swan
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Massey v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Massey
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sarah Jones, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Balzan v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv03720
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Reyes Balzan
Defendant:
CCDOC, Tom Dart and CCDOC Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
USA v. Tramale J. Hooser
as 24-1789
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TRAMALE J. HOOSER
Roderick Patterson v. Kerry Forsteal, et al
as 24-1790
Plaintiff:
RODERICK S. PATTERSON
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORSTEAL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALLYSON HUMPHREY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
