Cases 71 - 80 of 417,336
H0WARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner:
KIRK H0WARD
Respondent:
JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent:
M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babecki v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Anthony R. Babecki
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins v. Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institute
as 8:2024cv01019
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Damien Adkins
Respondent:
Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lard v. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
as 4:2024cv04074
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick v. USA
as 4:2024cv00607
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valley v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00608
Petitioner:
Robert Valley
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
STEVEN JACKSON
Respondent:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON and INTERIM WARDEN SHANE DADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
