Cases 71 - 80 of 31,107
Hainline v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blake Hainline
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Stine v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Katie Lynn Stine and Lind
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Strange v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Strange
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Porter v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05084
Plaintiff:
Ebony L. Porter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lager v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Scott Lager
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Edna Anderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lowell Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05032
Plaintiff:
Edward Jasen Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Willett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jacob W Willett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Isiah A Watson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
