Cases 71 - 80 of 10,200
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kew v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jordan Kew
Defendant:
Linn County Correctional Center, State Public Defenders Office, Cedar Rapids, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Johnson v. Dubuque County Jail Staff
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Jarrell D Johnson
Defendant:
Dubuque County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onken v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv04017
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Amber Onken
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Aloula v. Randall et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Atabonam Aloula
Defendant:
Shelly Randall, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Grey v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
William R. Grey and William R Grey
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Employment Discrimination (Age)
Hane v. United States Attorney General
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Kyle Mark Hane
Defendant:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
