Cases 71 - 80 of 323,513
LANCE-GEIGER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
MARGIE LANCE-GEIGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOYER
as 5:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FRANCINE MOYER
GRAHAM v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv01862
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY GRAHAM
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, ENOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. doing business as Techno Torch, BIC USA Inc. and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
RP Wynstone, LP et al v. NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
RP Wynstone, LP, REAL PRO ENTERPRISES, LP and Provident Trust Group, LLC
Defendant:
NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP, NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP AUTHORITY, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANNONI v. ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANNONI
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KLIESH v. CASSIDY et al
as 2:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
ANDREW G. CASSIDY, ROBERT O. BALDI and KRISTI B. HOOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODS v. WARDEN USP CANAAN
as 2:2024cv01833
Petitioner:
MARK WOODS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 2:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUIGLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND T. QUIGLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
