Cases 71 - 80 of 26,302
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN and MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GREEN v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, DEPUTY WARDEN McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PACHECO v. FERNANDEZ et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
YARY PACHECO
Defendant:
Julio C. Fernandez, LML Express NC LLC and RIS Risk Management Services
DOE 4A et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4A, JANE DOE 4B and MINOR DOE 4
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ALEXANDER v. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN L ALEXANDER
Defendant:
MARTN J O'MALLEY, RYAN YOUNG, AMANDA STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
