Cases 71 - 80 of 111,952
Powell v. Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
FAWN POWELL
Defendant:
Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital doing business as MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND and MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Likes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maria A. Likes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 117 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
KLINGMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07098
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KLINGMAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BELLO, BAKER, AKENADI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Forest River Inc.
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hill
Defendant:
Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Clarke v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Chanda Clarke
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
